Category: Technology

Lego has long been regarded as among the most creative of children’s toys, encouraging the nurture of design skills, and letting young hands make their first steps towards architectural greatness. Likewise, the more advanced Lego Technic line has fostered an interest in mechanics and engineering, with its motorised components and remote controlled models requiring a little more expertise to assemble.

But thanks to an ongoing partnership between Lego Technic and Volvo, the two companies are looking to an even more exciting future – autonomous vehicles. And they’ve enlisted the next generation of engineers – Technic obsessed children – to help in the design.

The Zeux is the latest entry into the Lego Technic line, a 1,167-piece wheel loader that comes with articulated four-wheel steering, a working boom and bucket and an active counterweight that raises and lowers the chassis.

It’s the impressive result of a collaboration between the two companies, which now stretches back to 2016, and is inspiring Volvo’s autonomous vehicle ambitions, with elements of the Zeux concept now patented with the intention of introducing them into full size, industrial-working models. 

“One of the coolest things about this is that it was a true collaboration, a mixture of Volvo designers and engineers and Lego Technics designers, capturing that knowledge of how real machines should work, how it could be more efficient and effective, and letting the designers go crazy,” said Andrew Woodman, Senior Design Manager for the Lego Group.

“Not having restrictions, but having the ability to put things together in a whole new way was something really interesting. The mixture of the teams, and the energy that created, was beneficial to both groups.”

From Wall-E to a child’s possible reality

The final rendered model, intended as a blueprint for future AI-driven vehicles, appears far more personable than most of the relatively-faceless autonomous vehicles we see in development at the moment. There’s a hint of Pixar’s Wall-E to the Zeux – and that’s in large part thanks to suggestions offered by children involved in the design process.

“For Lego, children are the heart of what we do,” continued Woodman.

“So whenever we’re making new products we always involve them in the process. We give them products to look at, we give them products to build with, we let them play with stuff and basically let us direct our design involvement, right down to the features and functions that you see in the final model.

“This project was no different. This time we collected the three favourite directions that we had from the different concepts at the time, we benchmarked it against the very first product we did together with Volvo, with the intention of focussing in on the wheel loader aspect of it.” 

With the Zeux intended to be a conceptual showcase for construction products of the future, it proved particularly insightful into the expectations of which children have for the world around them as they grew up. And, with the design resulting in numerous patents being awarded and elements being worked on for real-world application, in this project the children also had the chance to influence an element of the future they’d perhaps eventually grow to be a part of.

“By putting it in front of the kids, letting them play with them and come with their own stories, that’s when we see things really come alive. When we’re testing stuff, it’s not just a case of ‘oh I like this, oh I don’t like this.’ It’s when they tell stories about how they’d play with it and use it, and how it’d be used in the real world, that’s when we really start discovering what the right functions are and features to use.

The small mapping drone that’s present with the models was one key feature that the children in the testing groups insisted upon, and points to the level of familiarity and easiness with which youngsters are already approaching concepts around autonomous creations.

“[The children] don’t even see or think about the driver, the machine would be controlled through the drone. That for them was instant – that’s just the way it should be, the way it is. They don’t even think there’s something missing, which is really cool.”

Likewise, the “personable” camera eye, conceptually rendered to be expressively moving around on an articulating arm – letting you be aware of the autonomous vehicles point of focus, and giving it its Wall-E like personality – was a design consideration reinforced by the influence of the children involved.

“[The camera is something] we’re really proud of, as it’s letting you connect as a person with an autonomous vehicle,” said Woodman.

“An autonomous vehicle, with all of its sensors, and all of its features, knows exactly where it is. But how do you know that it knows where it is? And how do you know that the vehicle has seen you? 

“When you walk in front of a car parked at a junction you instinctively make eye contact with the driver. You then make a series of decisions in order to know it’s safe to cross, based on that eye contact. If you have a vehicle with no way of communicating with you, even if it could never run into you, or move with you around – but you don’t know that. So the kids stories helped with the camera to personalise the autonomy.”

While the Technics model measures 18cm, any realised full size Zeux would weigh more than 13,000kg, and measure just over 6 meters long, running fully autonomously off an electric battery.

“It’s kind of unique, the result,” says Roland Schling, Chief Designer at Volvo CE.

“There’s a little bit of a blank spot on the map with autonomous products. You have the cars already, planes, drones. You’ve seen those before. But what is this? It’s not a people transporting product. It’s more like something you work with – a co-worker almost.

“The closest relative would be maybe Wall-E from the Disney movie, or maybe even a Transformer or something like that. We’re very excited about this.”

The Lego Technic Zeux concept wheel loader will be in shops this August, with prices for each market to be determined. As for the real thing? That’ll be some time further into the future, one that will have been, in part, designed by the children of today.

http://www.techradar.com/news/building-a-real-life-wall-e-how-kids-helped-lego-technic-and-volvo-design-the-autonomous-zeux-wheel-loader

The countdown continues to the iPhone XI, or the iPhone 9, or whatever Apple is calling this year’s devices, and the latest rumor to reach us involves the technical configuration of one or more of the new handsets: specifically, that a dual-SIM might be involved.

That’s according to sources speaking to the 21st Century Business Herald in China. Apparently models for some countries will use a standard dual-SIM tray, while others will incorporate a standard SIM and the bespoke Apple SIM you can already find in some iPad Pro models. At this point it’s not clear which of the three 2018 iPhones will get the tech.

The Herald doesn’t have any previous form in predicting Apple’s hardware moves, so take this report with several grains of salt. That said, respected Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo has previously hinted that dual-SIM technology could arrive in this year’s iPhones.

One SIM good, two SIMs better

Being able to manage two numbers from one phone is a feature a lot of users in developing nations rely on – and that’s part of the reason why the iPhone lags behind Android outside the US. The global appeal of the iPhone would certainly get a boost.

At the same time, we know that Western carriers aren’t keen on dual-SIM technology, because of the money they make on international plans. With recent changes in roaming charges, there might be some flexibility on that front now, though we’d still be surprised if dual-SIM models arrived in the US and UK.

In September, we should find out for sure – in the meantime, file this in the “possible” column. You can also expect the usual speed bumps in terms of performance, an iPhone X-esque notch design across all the models, and of course iOS 12.

Via Apple Insider

http://www.techradar.com/news/one-of-this-years-new-iphones-might-have-dual-sim-capabilities

In a recent press conference, former referee and now chairman of FIFA’s referees committee, Pierluigi Collina said that VAR at the Russia 2018 World Cup was “very close to perfection”. 

He was referring to the 99.3% accuracy rate the video assistant referee system has had so far in the tournament. If this is indeed the case – and who are we to doubt FIFA’s statisticians? – then why has there been so much controversy around the technology that, on paper, has improved the game? 

For this answer, you have to go right back to one of the first uses of VAR in a domestic football league. This was after the technology was labeled a shambles when it was trialed in the 2017 Confederations Cup.

It was August, 2017, and Sydney FC were playing against Perth Glory. The game was an important one, as the team who won the match would proceed to the A-League grand final. 

By half-time, however, the game was pretty much over. The score was 3-0 to Sydney FC but two of these goals, before the arrival of VAR, wouldn’t have been given. VAR reversed the decision of two disallowed goals, both originally flagged as offside. The result was a controversial one but was accepted. VAR had stamped its authority, changing the face of the game and ushering in a new era of football that relied on technology. 

(Main image credit: OZAN KOSE / AFP)

The video monitor used on-pitch by referees

The video monitor used on-pitch by referees (Credit: Lars Baron – FIFA/FIFA via Getty Images)

In October, the two teams played again. This time, it was a VAR decision too far for Perth Glory manager Kenny Lowe who, after the game, said the use of VAR was “making a mockery of a lovely game”. The reason: the referee took four minutes consulting VAR, only to confirm that a penalty that was originally given should have… been given. 

VAR was being criticised for changing the flow of a match. There is a stop-start nature to football (inevitable with free kicks, corners and cards) but VAR was shifting it to something closer to the NFL and those on the pitch, let alone the fans, weren’t happy.

The FFA (Football Federation Australia) responded in the only way it knew how, with a press release. 

“The VAR principle of minimum interference for maximum benefit was not achieved last night and the team will implement better communication protocols to ensure no repeat of this incident,” it read.

The VAR team in the VOR room

The VAR team in the VOR room

Skip to the World Cup and FIFA decided that, despite many niggles and much backlash, VAR was actually ready for the big league and a whole lot of preparation has gone into making sure that four-minute decisions are no longer a thing. 

Despite the issues VAR has had in the past, FIFA is sticking with the technology. The idea is that it doesn’t want to change the game but bring it into the modern day, with the hope that there will never be a Hand of God moment again. But how does it actually work?

How VAR works

12 referees have been chosen to be video assistant referees and they won’t set foot on the pitch, but be in a VOR (video operation room). They were all chosen as they have experience with this type of video technology in the countries they are from.

Every game has four referees glued to video screens: one video assistant referee (the main VAR) and three assistant video assistant referees (AVAR1, AVAR2 and AVAR3).

The main VAR has one video feed that they watch, and underneath this a monitor comprising split screen showing four feeds. AVAR1 takes the main feed, AVAR2 is in charge of offside challenges and watches two screens for this – they have access to two dedicated cameras that aren’t used anywhere else. AVAR3 is watching the game as we would – they have their eyes on the television feed. 

The VOR is centralized and is actually situated in Moscow. Each of the 12 stadiums’ video feeds are sent to this room (and each stadium has 33 cameras) through fibre optics. It’s also through this system that the on-pitch referee speaks to the VAR team.

In the knockout stages, two extra slow-motion cameras are installed behind the goals to offer more choice for the VAR crew.

When is VAR used?

VAR can only be summoned through certain ways. For obvious reasons, it’s only used in real game-changing situations. 

The first is when there’s a goal and a potential offence has happened that lead to the goal. 

Then there’s penalty decisions: ones that have been awarded and ones that haven’t, but there’s contention that they should have been.

The third is to do with red card incidences and the fourth is all about mistaken identity. 

Out of these, video is reviewed by the on-field referee – that’s when you see them running over to a monitor – when a goal’s been scored and there is the potential of an off-side ruling or foul committed. Video will also be used when there is a foul leading up to a penalty and for red cards. 

VAR is consulted (no video, but a chat through the radio comms) for lesser penalty issues and cases of mistaken identity.

To make all of this work, the following tech companies are used – Video Assistant Referee (VAR): Crescent Comms (audio) and Hawk-Eye Innovations (video); Goal-Line Technology (GLT): Hawk-Eye Innovations.

The results so far…

If you were to go by Twitter, then VAR has both its fans and its detractors. BBC Five Live radio host and lifelong football fan Danny Baker is quite succinct in his thoughts about VAR (please skip these, if you are offended by swearing):

Although he was quite happy when Germany was stung with a VAR decision. 

Former footballer turned pundit Stan Collymore is a little more reasoned.

Collymore is right, VAR is making a difference in the World Cup. Yes, it got off to a shaky start. Diego Costa said “it can make you look stupid” when he took the accolade of being the first footballer at a World Cup final to be questioned by VAR. 

But since then it has been fine-tuned and that stat stands: 99.3% of decisions have been correct using VAR, 95% without (stat correct at time of writing).

That is from 335 incidences analysed by VAR, where 17 reviews were made and 14 decisions changed as a result. 

“Before running you have to learn to walk,” said referee committee chairman Pierluigi Collina about the VAR results. 

“I don’t know what’s possible in the future, but I think it’s a bit early for that now. I agree it would be interesting, though, and would perhaps make decisions better accepted by the football community.”

A referee checking a VAR situation. (Credit: Maja Hitij - FIFA/FIFA via Getty Images)

A referee checking a VAR situation. (Credit: Maja Hitij – FIFA/FIFA via Getty Images)

Whatever happens with VAR and the World Cup, there’s no doubt the technology has made an impact; it’s a talking point and the cause of many an argument up and down the country. It is much like any contentious decision made by a referee, but this time the rage is very much against a machine. 

Even if VAR does end up being the darling of the World Cup, the football world on a domestic level is still slow to react to the technology, 

The Premier League voted against using VAR in the 2018/19 season, with two-thirds of the clubs voting to defer the use and instead test the technology in the background. 

This is something they might start to regret, if the decisions keep going the right way.

TechRadar’s World Cup coverage is brought to you in association with Honor. 

http://www.techradar.com/news/what-is-var-the-controversial-star-of-world-cup-2018-decoded